上周的雅思写作TASK TWO考题是(据网友回忆)：

　　Some people say job satisfaction is more important than jobsecurity, while others think people can not always expect enjoyment in jobs and working permanently is more important.

　　Discuss both these views and gives your own opinion.

　　这个题材比较老了，也比较生活化，写起来难度不大。

　　开头段Logan写得比较简单，从一个简单的社会现象引出争论，但没有在开头段给出全文的中心论点。像这种Discuss both views的题目不建议在开头段把双方及自己的观点全都罗列出来，因为这就相当于把下面三个论证段的中心句全堆在开头了，然后后面再逐一重复，显得很累赘。

　　主体段段第二段分别写debate双方的观点。在这样一个篇幅的限制下Logan没有罗列太多观点，而是围绕一两个观点将论述过程尽量展开。Logic Development很重要。

　　主体段的第三段论述自己的观点。其实雅思写作大部分话题都是比较有争议的，也就是说站在任何一方的立场其实都可以写。因此这里Logan站在不同立场写了两段，分别用不同颜色的字体做了区分。注意在这一段中Logan并没有重复之前双方的观点，而是提出了新的argument来说明为何支持某一方的观点。

　　结尾段留给大家去写吧。顺便说一下，结尾段真的不重要。

　　北京新航道雅思培训小编希望大家在读范文的时候关注论证的过程和语言以及篇章的结构。至于观点，其实雅思考试并不需要有多么深刻。欢迎大家模仿改写。

　　Sample:

　　Rarely is it the case today that one would stick to a job for a lifetime. Unlike our parents, who would consider stability the most important feature of a career, we tend to appreciate something different.

　　To the majority of young people today, Job satisfaction, or, in another word, happiness, has become the prior concern when seeking a job. Their major argument is based upon the idea that the ultimate goal of working is to help achieve better lives. But recent studies have revealed that boredom, hostility, stress and frustration in work places can lead to physical and mental diseases, ruining our lives. So if we work eventually to live a better life, it makes no sense to do a job, no matter how well-paid it is, that we dislike.

　　This attitude is being criticized by another group of old-schools who still highly value job security. First of all, they point out, that work is only a part of life, ergo disappointments from work would not affect life thatmuch. Moreover, a good life is fundamentally depending on the food on the table and the cash in the pocket. In this sense, job security means being free from worries about the basic needs and being able to really enjoy life.

　　Personally, I tend to side with the youngsters in this argumentation because the other side of the debate fails to notice a simple fact that the competitions in work places has grown to be ridiculously fierce, so much so that no job is “secured” anymore. In addition to that, the business world is changing really fast today, large businesses such as NOKIA might go bankrupted in a matter of few days, and people who have earned “permanent” positions in these companies would end up with nothing.

　　Personally, I tend to side with the old-schools in this dispute because the other side’s argument is grounded upon a faulty premise that “another” job would be better. Truly, a new job might by all means seem appealingcomparing to the old one at first, but sooner or later the defects would reveal themselves. That means, one way or another, one would have to put up with some of the demerits that he or she does not feel quite happy with. So, instead of keeping looking for a “better” job, one should try to deal with the defects and solve the problems once and for all.

　　In conclusion,…