新航道-用心用情用力做教育!咨询热线 400-779-6688

客服中心 课程中心 校区网点 奖学金 资质证书
新航道北京学校

400-779-6688

首页

TOEFL托福

当前位置:首页 > 托福频道 > 托福写作 > 支招托福作文 | 学术讨论范文

支招托福作文 | 学术讨论范文

发布时间:2024-12-30 关键词:托福作文

摘要:Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

  Question

  Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

  In your response, you should do the following.

  - Express and support your opinion.

  - Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words.

  An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

托福作文

  Doctor Gupta

  In recent years, the rise of artificial intelligence has introduced Al generators to draft essays and articles. While some people believe this is a valuable tool that can help writers save time and enhance their creativity, others argue that relying on Al undermines the development of writing skills and critical thinking. Do you think Al generators should be restricted? Please explain your reasoning.

  Claire

  I think Al generators should be restricted, mainly due to the high risk of plagiarism. Since Al doesn't always cite its sources, writers could unintentionally use ideas from others without proper attribution. For example, relying too much on Al could result in students facing academic penalties if their work is flagged for unoriginal content.

  Andrew

  I believe Al generators should continue to be used because they help writers focus on polishing their work rather than getting stuck on initial drafts. From my experience, Al can highlight mistakes or improve structure. It allows me to spend more time refining their ideas, ultimately producing higher-quality essays.

  范文正文

  I share Andrew's view that AI generators should not be restricted on the grounds that they can serve as tools for inspiration【同位语从句】. To elaborate, no matter how knowledgeable and experienced someone is, he or she still has blind spots. Advanced artificial intelligence, which pools information by aggregating data from various sources【定语从句作插入语】, helps writers explore new perspectives and overcome blocks. Take high school students preparing TOEFL writing tasks as an example. While some writing topics that relate to everyday experiences are familiar to most students【让步状语从句】, others - like business development or political science - can be quite challenging to understand. This makes generating ideas for a well-structured essay even more difficult. With the assistance of ChatGPT, students not only gain valuable insights into the subject matter but also learn how to structure their essays effectively by providing compelling arguments and specific examples【not only...but also并列句】. Without this AI support, most students would struggle to foster a deep understanding of complex topics and to express their ideas clearly in the absence of teachers.

  用词用语整理

  本题是2024年10月16日托福学术讨论真题。题目结合现今社会流行话题“人工智能”。教授问学生对于AI写作,是否需要限制?学生Claire提出限制的必要性,因为学生滥用AI会非常容易导致学术舞弊。Andrew认为使用AI写作还是能带来很多积极影响,比如帮学生润色改错。对大多数考生来说,这个话题相对离学习和生活较近,比较容易想到写作思路。比如之前真考的同学就结合自己的亲身经历想到AI可以帮助他想到之前想不到的思路和点子。

  这篇作文采取了“观点+论点+解释+举例”的写作思路,选择支持Andrew的观点“不限制AI generator”,因为AI给人们提供新思路,启发人们,毕竟不管是多有经验多有知识储备的人,总有自己的知识盲区。作者举了备考托福写作的学生的例子,提到学生虽然熟悉托福关于教育和生活方面的话题,但是一旦碰到政府,工作等离生活较远的题材的时候,他们就很容易没有新的想法,导致写作进行不下去。这个时候求助于ChatGPT,它不仅能提出新的角度,还能给出具体的理由和细节例子,更好地帮助学生形成文章切入点和框架。

  学习这篇作文可以帮助考生们积累与科技AI和教育类有关的写作素材,比如有AI的特点,学生的瓶颈,AI怎么帮助学生等。

  用词用语整理

  【同位语从句】

  I share Andrew's view that AI generators should not be restricted on the grounds that they can serve as tools for inspiration.

  I share sb’s view that ... 此处用同位语从句替代I think/In my opinion等表达

  【定语从句作插入语】

  No matter how knowledgeable and experienced someone is, he or she still has blind spots. Advanced artificial intelligence, which pools information by aggregating data from various sources, helps writers explore new perspectives and overcome blocks.

  定语从句作插入语,提到人工智能是通过汇集来自不同来源的数据来整合信息的。此处定语从句作插入语的内容也解释了为什么人工智能能够给人们提供inspiration。

  【not only...but also并列句】.

  With the assistance of ChatGPT, students not only gain valuable insights into the subject matter but also learn how to structure their essays effectively by providing compelling arguments and specific examples

  not only...but also并列句用来增加细节描述。

  on the grounds that 由于

  这个词组用来替代because,是它的书面升级版本

  例句:On the grounds that he was absent, we had to reschedule the meeting.因他缺席,我们不得不重新安排会议。

  serve as v.作为,充当,起到xxx作用

  blind spots n.盲区

  在驾驶中,它指的是驾驶员的视线盲区。在更广泛的语境中,它也可以用来比喻一个人认知上的缺陷或忽视的地方。

  pool v.集中资源(或材料等)

  aggregate v.合计;总计;汇集

  explore v.探讨,研究(观点或建议)

  generate v.产生(想法/主意)

  gain valuable insights into v. 深入了解

  compelling adj. 有说服力的

  in the absence of 在没有xxx的情况下,替换without

 新航道-用心用情用力做教育!

  >>点击在线咨询<<

 400-892-8866

上一篇:没有了
免费预约体验课
请选择您想学习的课程
留学预备课程
雅思IELTS
托福TOEFL
A-Level、IB、AP、BC、PGA
SAT/ACT
GRE/GMAT
SSAT/小托福
全封闭学院(住宿班)
出国留学
免费领取
意向课程
请选择您想学习的课程
留学预备课程
雅思IELTS
托福TOEFL
A-Level、IB、AP、BC、PGA
SAT/ACT
GRE/GMAT
SSAT/小托福
全封闭学院(住宿班)
出国留学
姓名
电话
免费领取
996
ETS托福联盟星级成员
免费通话
微信客服
返回顶部
×

预约试听

给我回电!

免费电话咨询服务,请放心接听